Obama’s chart (top) measures the rate of change from month to month. Pollster.com’s chart (bottom) measures the cumulative number of unemployed.
Anyone remember calculus? One chart graphs the derivative of the other. Acceleration vs. distance travelled.
Obama’s chart doesn’t lie, but it does misstate the nature of the problem. We don’t care that fewer people lost their jobs this month than last month. We care that the total number of people unemployed is still ridiculously high.
Another way to look at it: imagine you get pulled over for speeding. The officer says you were going 85. You respond, but I was going 115 and then I slowed down! So I shouldn’t get a ticket. That’s the logic of the Obama chart.
31 notes
-
tester-webmaster liked this
-
hyperlife liked this
-
isnteverything liked this
-
schwegler reblogged this from aatombomb and added:
I must say, however, that both charts are very important. The Chart on the bottom shows that the problem isn’t getting...
-
edkohler liked this
-
dylicious reblogged this from grantbussinger and added:
I think we can all agree that Obama inherited this problem. All we have to judge him based upon is the changes that have...
-
dylicious liked this
-
brettnolan reblogged this from grantbussinger
-
bencochran liked this
-
grantbussinger reblogged this from aatombomb
-
dietcock liked this
-
matthewgallaway liked this
-
enteekaygee liked this
-
aatombomb reblogged this from spiegelman and added:
I wish I didn’t have...agree with this,...yes. The whole...
-
aatombomb liked this
-
choire liked this
-
americastoppushing liked this
-
lowindustrial liked this
-
spiegelman posted this

